Skip to content
FirstSounding

Confirmatory diligence

Independent diligence, delivered while terms can still change.

FirstSounding reads the full data room, checks it against itself and against the public record, and delivers a reviewed red-flag report within three business days of access. Every finding is cited to the document and page and carries an estimate of its impact on value.

Finding 01 of 14

Severity: high

Channel inventory supporting reported growth

Issue
Shipments to the two largest retailers grew 34%. Sell-through grew 9%.
Evidence
Mgmt accounts, tab "Revenue by account"Folder 4.2, retailer POS report, p. 3
Reviewer's note
Confirmed against shipment detail.
Estimated impact
$0.8M to $1.4Mrun-rate EBITDA$8M to $14Menterprise value

Reviewed and approved before delivery

Illustrative finding. Project Atlas, figures invented.

01

First report in three business days

From data room access, with updates until closing.

02

Every finding cited

To the source document and page, or to the public record.

03

Every finding reviewed

Approved by a practitioner with transaction-services experience before delivery.

04

Fixed fee

Per deal, agreed in the engagement letter before work begins.

The problem

Exclusivity periods are short relative to the volume of a data room.

Once the LOI is signed, the deal team has a few weeks to confirm the thesis, and accounting, legal, and commercial advisors typically report toward the end of that window. A data room can hold thousands of documents, so review is generally sample-based, and inconsistencies between documents can go undetected.

The issues that move price rarely sit inside a single document. The CIM, the management model, the ledger, the bank statements, and the customer contracts can each appear reasonable on their own and still fail to reconcile with each other. Issues that do surface often reach the negotiation as observations rather than quantified exposures.

Time to negotiate on cited findings

FirstSounding report

Business day 3

Day 0
LOI signed
Day 15Day 30Day 45Day 60
Signing
Management meeting
QoE fieldwork
Counsel and purchase agreement
Typical 60-day exclusivity period. Illustrative.

What you get

Four deliverables, updated until closing.

01

A ranked red-flag report

Every material finding, ordered by estimated dollar impact, with the source cited and a reviewer's sign-off. By day three, the deal team knows where to focus the remainder of exclusivity.

02

Price-impact ranges

Each finding translated into an EBITDA adjustment range and a valuation range, mapped to the remedies on the table: price, escrow, specific indemnity, closing condition. Findings arrive in the language of the negotiation.

03

A ranked follow-up list

Missing documents and questions for the seller and for management, ranked by the dollar impact of the finding behind them. Management meetings focus on the items that affect value.

04

An LOI assumption table

Each assumption the LOI rests on, marked confirmed, weakened, or broken, with the finding behind it. All four deliverables are updated as the seller adds documents, until closing.

How we look at a deal

The data room checked against itself, and against everything outside it.

Cross-source reconciliationSix sources (CIM, management model, audited financials, tax returns, bank statements, customer contracts) tied to each other. One mismatch: FY2025 revenue of $48.2M in the CIM against $44.9M of bank deposits, a $3.3M gap.CIMManagement modelAudited financialsTax returnsBank statementsCustomer contractsFY2025 revenue, gap $3.3MCIM $48.2M / deposits $44.9MCross-source reconciliationSix sources (CIM, management model, audited financials, tax returns, bank statements, customer contracts) tied to each other. One mismatch: FY2025 revenue of $48.2M in the CIM against $44.9M of bank deposits, a $3.3M gap.CIMManagement modelAudited financialsTax returnsBank statementsCustomer contractsFY2025 revenue, gap $3.3MCIM $48.2M / deposits $44.9M
Illustrative reconciliation. Figures invented.

Cross-source reconciliation

We tie the CIM, the model, the audited financials, tax returns, bank statements, and contract-level revenue to each other, and flag every place they disagree.

Reconciliation

Forensic review

Altered documents, ledger anomalies, related-party flows, period-end revenue spikes, and collateral pledged more than once: patterns that standard reviews often miss.

Forensic review

Outside-in verification

Litigation, liens, regulatory actions, headcount trends, customer reviews, and web traffic, compared with what the data room claims.

Outside-in verification

QoE pre-read

Revenue, cohorts, concentration, and margins rebuilt from invoices, ledgers, and bank data rather than the seller's summary tabs. The QoE provider begins with the accounts that require attention.

QoE pre-read

Human review

Technology-assisted review. Practitioner-approved findings.

Software reads every page, which is what makes a three-day turnaround possible. Nothing reaches your team until a reviewer with transaction-services experience has checked it, tied it out, and approved it. Specialists in forensic accounting, regulation, or contracts are engaged when a finding requires them.

The result combines complete coverage with professional judgment. No unverified AI output reaches an investment committee memo.

How human review works

Where it fits

Alongside your QoE provider and counsel, not instead of them.

FirstSounding is an independent pre-read. It lands before the QoE report and before counsel's final review, so both start from a map of the problems instead of a blank data room. Lenders will still require a signed QoE, and that QoE will start from a stronger base.

Working with your advisors

Who it is for

Built for buyers in confirmatory diligence.

Private equity firms, private credit funds and direct lenders, growth equity investors, family offices, and independent sponsors. Core checks run on every deal. Sector modules add industry-specific tests, from sell-through data for consumer brands to billing patterns in healthcare to recurring revenue in software.

Confidentiality

Deal data remains confidential and isolated.

We work from our own named seat in the data room, never shared credentials. Each deal runs in an isolated workspace that is deleted when the engagement ends. Client and target data are never used to train models and never shared across clients.

Security and confidentiality
A wall of closed archival drawers in a dim stone room, lit by soft raking light.

Discuss a transaction under LOI.

Share the sector, the deal size, and the end of exclusivity. We respond within one business day with an assessment of fit and the proposed scope of the report.